Letters and educational materials dealing with manure management issues and application regulations are being mailed to livestock producers throughout Ohio. In addition to OSU Extension, the collaborative effort includes the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Ohio Livestock Coalition, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Ohio Federation of Soil and Water Conservation Districts, and the Ohio Department of Agriculture.
“The collaboration is in response to a rash of calls Soil and Water Conservation District offices and Ohio EPA have been receiving regarding concerns over manure applications on frozen or snow-covered soils,” said Jon Rausch, OSU Extension animal manure management program director. “There’s a greater risk of pollution, such as run-off, with manure applications during freezing/thawing events. Producers need to stay within application guidelines to reduce those risks.”
Many livestock producers apply manure in the winter because their operations do not have enough manure storage to get them through the winter, Rausch said. Producers also take advantage of the availability of labor and equipment, and the reduction of compaction on frozen soils, to apply manure.
“Manure is applied to the soil as a fertilizer and to improve fertility,” Rausch said. “Producers should be applying manure at a rate suitable for plant utilization and not for disposal, especially with the price of commercial fertilizer continuing to increase.”
Manure application on frozen and snow-covered soil is not recommended. However, if application is necessary, based on NRCS Practice Standard 633, all of the following criteria must be met:
Following winter manure application guidelines is important because any pollution violation could result in the loss of the winter application option.
“For many producers, it could become economically challenging for them to find ways to store manure through the winter,” Rausch said. “It’s not worth it to take those kinds of risks, especially when the outcome has the potential of impacting all of animal agriculture by banning winter application in Ohio.”